View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
DaKon Ville Supporter
Joined: 19 Feb 2002
Posts: 2342
|
Posted: Wed Apr 10, 2002 10:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Continuing my debate over os's, lets look at CPU'S.
Intel costs more with better frame rates and rendering capabilities, AMD. Hmmm. I am not a fan of AMD. The AMD chipset is old Intel tech.
And what I love to say is my game machine is a Celeron 400, 2000 Pro OS, overclocking (video, bus, cpudont ask unless you want a fire). I enjoy this sys to py on.
I could switch to my server box and make it my client (Intel 1.9, 1g, 40gb raid) but I am slow and never would even be able to see you lol.
DK WIld
_________________ P4E @ 4.00 Ghz, LeadTech 6800GT 420mhz/1.16Ghz, 1 gb Corsair PC 4400, Creative X-fi, Raptor
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Blown Registered User
Joined: 15 Dec 2001 Location: Medford Oregon Posts: 4172
|
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2002 1:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
I wont totally agree on the rendering capabilities part. I ran a test a while back with some AMD thunderbirds vs Intel P4's and the AMD will render a bryce image faster than the P4 at equal clock speeds. Same image, all calculated by time. AMD has a better price point than intel also for equivelent performance. As far as graphics goes, IMO unless you run at low res you really are more dependant on your graphics card than the processor. You can put a good graphics card in a P4 or AMD and get almost the same FPS under both. AMD chipsets have come a long way the past yr and a half and stability issues that plaqued them have subsided quite a bit. I know when via started being the main chipset there was alot of probs, but now you just dont see that anymore for the most part. I think either system now is just a good as the other, I would personally just buy based on a price/performance standpoint.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lil-Yugi Registered User
Joined: 23 Jan 2002 Location: New York Posts: 1875
|
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2002 4:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Blown the AMD machine might of had more than the intel machine. The memory must have help loaded the picture faster.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Blown Registered User
Joined: 15 Dec 2001 Location: Medford Oregon Posts: 4172
|
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2002 5:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nah, they were almost identical in memory, had the same speed processor. Just the AMD has a better FPU than an Intel as same clock speeds.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mongoose_Slayer Registered User
Joined: 23 Feb 2002 Location: Wisconsin Posts: 1582
|
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2002 5:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I personally think that AMD is better. I have an AMD Athalon processor myself, and it's better than any intel!! WOO |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lil-Yugi Registered User
Joined: 23 Jan 2002 Location: New York Posts: 1875
|
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2002 6:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
On 2002-04-11 18:37, blown65 wrote:
Nah, they were almost identical in memory, had the same speed processor. Just the AMD has a better FPU than an Intel as same clock speeds.
|
The Keyword Is Almost .
_________________
My Trusty EMP Gernade Always Gets The Job Done.
[ This Message was edited by: Sneaky_Lil_Mikey on 2002-04-11 19:21 ] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PondScum007 Registered User
Joined: 20 Dec 2001 Location: `°•-middle of new jersey Posts: 1792
|
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2002 6:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
oh puh-leeeeez! mikey, that tiny bit of memory diff enables you to toss an emp .0000000000000000000000000002ns faster than the average joe (though not me) and you sure do put it to damn good use, but its an itty bitty almost...almost nonexistant
hehe
AMD rØxoR§
_________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Blown Registered User
Joined: 15 Dec 2001 Location: Medford Oregon Posts: 4172
|
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2002 8:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I guess the Intel that had more memory hurt it. I never said which computer had more memory.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lil-Yugi Registered User
Joined: 23 Jan 2002 Location: New York Posts: 1875
|
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2002 9:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm talking about RAM!!!!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Blown Registered User
Joined: 15 Dec 2001 Location: Medford Oregon Posts: 4172
|
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2002 9:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Im talking about RAM!!!! lol
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
PondScum007 Registered User
Joined: 20 Dec 2001 Location: `°•-middle of new jersey Posts: 1792
|
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2002 9:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
im talkign about ram!!!
haha wtf double!
_________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Vulcan Registered User
Joined: 29 Dec 2001
Posts: 2773
|
Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2002 7:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
AMD, and most gamers that I know of also think that AMD is a LOT better than Intel.
_________________ I need to make a sig, but I don't have the time. Maybe I will eventually. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hoaxie Registered User
Joined: 16 Dec 2001 Location: Florida Posts: 4471
|
Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2002 7:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LOL, he said RAM....
_________________
LONG LIVE THE 'VILLE! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BobaFett Registered User
Joined: 29 Jan 2002
Posts: 6
|
Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2002 9:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
You talking about ram???? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BobaFett Registered User
Joined: 29 Jan 2002
Posts: 6
|
Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2002 9:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
You talking about ram???? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|