View previous topic :: View next topic |
New rifleman models with rilfe grenade attachment? |
Does it replace the bazooka? |
|
27% |
[ 3 ] |
MAN GIVE ME ONE? |
|
72% |
[ 8 ] |
|
Total Votes : 11 |
|
Author |
Message |
Frosty1 Registered User
Joined: 24 Jun 2005 Location: Atlantic City, New Jersey Posts: 99
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lt. Black Registered User
Joined: 18 Dec 2004 Location: Pawtucket, RI Posts: 231
|
Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2005 7:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm really hoping against it. 'twould turn the game into Enemy Territory, and that's bad. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Stevo Ville Supporter
Joined: 08 Dec 2002 Location: Orange County Guild: TVR Posts: 9514
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Malanthros Registered User
Joined: 31 Jul 2005
Posts: 454
|
Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2005 4:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm really hoping it doesnt replace the bazooka and its extreme awesomeness. I frankly don't see why they are trying to do this, grenades were wonderful as they are now. I just dont know, I suppose we'll have to wait and see. _________________
Thank you Loka for helping me realize my dream of having a Sig. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Cake Ville Supporter
Joined: 20 Aug 2005
Posts: 117
|
Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2005 9:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
in my opinion the bazookas should have never been added to DOD. i know a lot of people love them and have fun with them, but it adds an entirely new element that is complely out of character with the game. it makes it feel like quake or tribes or something. i wish the grenade launchers were replacing the zooks but i think i read somewhere that the game will have both. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Canadian Rifle Registered User
Joined: 27 Jul 2005 Location: Winnipeg, MB Guild: TVR Posts: 800
|
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2005 2:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
well hopefully the rifleman comes with both m1 grenades and the rifle grenades then u would have four, which is alot. but if it was a class it would be kind of dumb to have 2 classes of rifleman who are the exact same with everything but the grenades it would be a waste, well that wat i think but i dont care wat it is lol i jsut want ti to come out already aslo i think that they should have bazookas jsut for some mpas if there are walls to break or sumthin like an objective but if worse came to worse they should get rid of them or put them in the spawn and the people can choose rather then haven a class of them! _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
crackhead_fred Registered User
Joined: 19 Dec 2004 Location: oh Posts: 380
|
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2005 2:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Canadian_Rifle wrote: | if worse came to worse they should get rid of them or put them in the spawn and the people can choose rather then haven a class of them! | I like this ^ idea the most. I like having a bazooka and have nades too, there are just times when the colt/luger can't get the job done (especially when u run out of ammo ). I was thinking that maybe the 2nd attack of the garand would be the use of the grenade launcher, but then I realized that it would prob make people angry since the butt attack would be gone. Or maybe they will be equiped with one norm grenade and one launcher grenade. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Clay Pigeon Registered User
Joined: 29 May 2002 Location: Michigan Posts: 1049
|
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2005 5:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rifle grenades were horrible performers in WW2. They weren't very good for anti-armor, as their charges were too small. They were also hard to use against infantry because it was not easy to aim them and their charges were rather small. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Canadian Rifle Registered User
Joined: 27 Jul 2005 Location: Winnipeg, MB Guild: TVR Posts: 800
|
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2005 6:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
u right they didnt do much and u had to be percise to make ur kill but think thats y they added them becuz they want to u become better and more accurate and this helps bcuz with norm grenades its pretty easy to be accurate! _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Canadian Rifle Registered User
Joined: 27 Jul 2005 Location: Winnipeg, MB Guild: TVR Posts: 800
|
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2005 6:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Clay Pigeon wrote: | Rifle grenades were horrible performers in WW2. They weren't very good for anti-armor, as their charges were too small. They were also hard to use against infantry because it was not easy to aim them and their charges were rather small. |
u right they didnt do much and u had to be percise to make ur kill but think thats y they added them becuz they want to u become better and more accurate and this helps bcuz with norm grenades its pretty easy to be accurate! _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|