I declare myself having the lowest fps...

Thom Yorke Obliterator · Posted: Thu May 30, 2002 8:05 pm Post subject:

Somewhere from 35-50 most times, with it capped at 50. That's with a 32MB TNT2 card, on a P4 1.something.

The TNT2 is history once I scrape up a few more bucks for a Ti 4200. Any takers? Maybe we can auction it off eBay style. VilleBay!

#X-mas

_________________
I'm not internationally known, but I'm known to rock the microphone.

DaKon · Ville Supporter Joined: 19 Feb 2002 Posts: 2342

...
_________________
P4E @ 4.00 Ghz, LeadTech 6800GT 420mhz/1.16Ghz, 1 gb Corsair PC 4400, Creative X-fi, Raptor

DaKon · Ville Supporter Joined: 19 Feb 2002 Posts: 2342

I cannot wait till the new Sierra/Valve engine is out. Just like some of the newest engines.

I want my 200 FPS back.

(Nivida 4 ti 4600 128 mb card, p4 2.0 Northwood, 512 mb pc 2700 ram, raid level 0)

DK

_________________
P4E @ 4.00 Ghz, LeadTech 6800GT 420mhz/1.16Ghz, 1 gb Corsair PC 4400, Creative X-fi, Raptor

rAT bOY · Posted: Thu May 30, 2002 10:21 pm Post subject:

My fps_max is 33. Any higher is too much for me. It's good for recording demos and making avi's.

Chan · Posted: Thu May 30, 2002 10:24 pm Post subject:

My connection is cable
I use a 8mb TNT 2 card
900 mhz and i get 60 fps. i can get more, but then text is too big.
-edit- I think it is because I have AMD it is so high. -/edit-
_________________

Chen Kenichi · Posted: Thu May 30, 2002 10:37 pm Post subject:

Link, not to long ago I averaged 4-5 fps. It is INCREDIBLE how much gameplay improves when you have a high fps. I'm not sure what mine is now, but after I changed my AMD K6II to AMD Athlon 1.somethingoranother ghz and my 192 SIMS RAM to a 256 DDR chip I couldnt believe how much easier it was to play. I've kept my 32 mb Nvidia TNT2 throughout the upgrade though.
_________________

EagleEyes · Posted: Fri May 31, 2002 12:06 pm Post subject:

Any FPS above 60 your eye can't tell the difference.

Clay Pigeon · Posted: Fri May 31, 2002 12:54 pm Post subject:

I have a Tbird w/ 266 fsb that I run at either 1.2 or 1.33 (its unlocked), and I use pc2100 ddr (currently have 256 megs, looking to upgrade), and my gfx card is a GF2 GTS w/ 32 megs of DDR. Now I just need a connection that will match...

BitterBeerFace · Posted: Fri May 31, 2002 1:08 pm Post subject:

I'm running a Viper 550 16MB on a PIII 450, 256MB RAM... typical fps is in the high-20's. fps is the least of my problems, though. Somehow, I still get choke of like 5-10 typically on netgraph. (right now my connection is totally down, but that's a different story) Is that because my old worn-out junk I play on can't handle the info as fast as I get it? I'm hoping it's not because my connection isn't phat enough. (I should be one of like 5 people now on a 1024Mb both-ways DSL)

Warhammer · Posted: Fri May 31, 2002 1:23 pm Post subject:

Warhammer · Posted: Fri May 31, 2002 1:27 pm Post subject:

Blown · Posted: Fri May 31, 2002 1:34 pm Post subject:

I've tried setting my maxfps at 60 before to see what it looks like and I can tell a difference between taht and my uncapped fps. Now the default of 72 and the 99 I get I cant tell any diff.

Lil-Yugi · Posted: Fri May 31, 2002 1:47 pm Post subject:

Warhammer... I was just kidding. Didn't you see what else I wrote.

Snaggletooth · Guest

I rock out at 70 fps. I found that it works just fine for me on my fatty LAN connection. I'm running a GeForce2 MX400 64MB in OpenGL @ 1280X1024
If I'm at home, I use my Dad's monitor and my fps hops up to 90. I didn't change any settings other than a different monitor. (19 vs 17inch)
My old roomate had a 22incher and he got about 150 fps. Of course, he had a GeForce3 Ti 500 with a dual AMD XP2100+ and 768mb of DDR...

ToRaK · Posted: Fri May 31, 2002 1:54 pm Post subject:

The old netcode was effected by your fps. The new netcode is not supposed to be effected by your max_fps settings.
_________________
The most hated.