| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
kubrick
Registered User
Joined: 29 Dec 2003
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 459
|
 Posted: Thu Jul 08, 2004 11:27 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
I also read something that aimbots are pretty useless in dod anyway because of the movement penalty.
I think wall hacks are proabably the most common or anti recoil. But they still have to aim and hit you. And if they're using the garand, well you know....  90 dmg |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Clay Pigeon
Registered User
Joined: 29 May 2002
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1049
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2004 3:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Strongbad wrote: | I also read something that aimbots are pretty useless in dod anyway because of the movement penalty.
I think wall hacks are proabably the most common or anti recoil. But they still have to aim and hit you. And if they're using the garand, well you know.... 90 dmg |
Dont forget the lovely k43 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Shovel me Silly
Registered User
Joined: 01 Jan 2004
Location: Minnesota Clan: Pub-X
Posts: 796
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2004 1:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Clay Pigeon wrote: | | Strongbad wrote: | I also read something that aimbots are pretty useless in dod anyway because of the movement penalty.
I think wall hacks are proabably the most common or anti recoil. But they still have to aim and hit you. And if they're using the garand, well you know.... 90 dmg |
Dont forget the lovely k43 |
The only guy that I've seen cheating, and it was really blatant, was using a k43. On avalanche he'd get above the allies first flag near the window and fire into the wall and would just kill everyone coming up. I've spammed that wall a lot and have done damage, but never killed anyone yet. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
