| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
FragFailure
Registered User
Joined: 12 Aug 2001
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 4219
|
 Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2003 1:52 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| DaRkAtH wrote: | | FragFailure wrote: | | BRN hates me now since I told him about 128 bit rate when he encodes. He's now at 192 |
What's so bad about 128? I can't really tell the difference between the two, except the difference in file size |
watery sounding drums, frequency range loss, and a flatter sound. I can notice the difference between 128, 192, 256, and the cd/wav file itself.
_________________
Yes, I'm still around
- PWG member 2001
- TVB founder and leader 2001-2004
- The Ville's Vegas Bashes I-V
- T.V.L. (Ville TFC League)
- The Originator of the Off-Topic Posts |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
YourPowersAreWeakOldMan
Registered User
Joined: 20 Aug 2001
Location: Houston Texas USA
Posts: 1745
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2003 7:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
I thought 160 was CD quality? and 192 was higher, digital quality?
I've always ripped mine at 192 and don't download anything less than 128.
_________________
World of Warcraft:
Bleeding Hollow PVP Server as Mortibund (undead mage) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
FragFailure
Registered User
Joined: 12 Aug 2001
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 4219
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2003 5:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
160 is a noticeable dropoff at times. 192 is pretty good except with a slight dropoff above the 14khz range. 224 and up (or VBR) is about full cd quality. You won't notice as much on a lower qulaity stereo or an average car cd player though. You'll only notice on lower equipment if the mp3 has the watery drum sound.
_________________
Yes, I'm still around
- PWG member 2001
- TVB founder and leader 2001-2004
- The Ville's Vegas Bashes I-V
- T.V.L. (Ville TFC League)
- The Originator of the Off-Topic Posts |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
